Amy Winehouse died for your sins
Take a good look.
This is how I choose to remember Amy Winehouse, an artist I really liked, and listened to a lot.
You think it’s disrespectful? That I should remember her they way she was before she fell from grace? I think quite the opposite. That it would be disrespectful to forget who she was, how she died, and our part in it.
Another splashy headline hits the newsstands and internet sites, chronicling the early, premature death of another rising star. One who had battled drugs, eating disorders, Alcoholism, stormy relationships, and some obvious mental problems, and now, like so many others before her, she will be remembered as a beautiful, tragic, icon, forever frozen in her turbulent youth, and I am more than sure, that posters, tattoos, and songs about her will start popping up everywhere.
Born to a working class Jewish family from the Southgate section of London, her rise in show business, was like that of many artists who become working class heroes overnight.
He music, dark, “edgy” with tons of references about drugs, hard feelings about love, depression, and betrayal, made her CD’s instant classics in the united states particularly, and her signature “You know I’m no good” “and “Rehab” were hummed by hundreds of thousands of people as they got drunk at bars and did lines of coke in the bathroom. I saw it all over the place when I was traveling. We idolized and shook our heads at her at the same time with each new piece of news about her out of control drug habit, her habit of consorting with losers, and obvious health problems.
And all of this is important now , why?
Because we love our rock stars teetering on the brink of destruction for our enjoyment.
Really, the fact that we even prefer dark and edgy music, and troubled souls for our entertainment says a lot about our dark side as consumers. A dark side most of us don’t feel empowered to embrace, or empower, because to do it the way our idols do, would mean losing our families, or jobs, or friends, or who knows what.
And that’s what we are. consumers, consuming them, without knowing anything about them really, just like we like to enjoy a great steak without seeing a cow slaughtered
So they become our surrogates, boozing, and fighting, and fucking their way through tormented lives, lives we sometimes wish we had the guts or freedom to experience ourselves, and somehow for us, their music is more “legit” and has more street cred because of it. And we read, and watch television shows about them, and hang on every dangerous reckless act they perform, and hope they can pull back from the brink long enough to make some more music.
Then, unfortunately, often they die in the prime of their lives, too young, and then we idolize that too. We idolize their now-eternal youth, as though it were some cosmic nod by fate saying “yes. you can live dangerously, and die, and still be beautiful forever”, because that is what we want to make of it. And it’s a lie.
No one really remembers or collects, (I am sure there a few who do) photos of the death scenes of their favorite musicians and actors, the pools of blood and vomit, and emaciated, or obese, bodies, the wreck hotel rooms strewn with drugs, dirty clothes, and other paraphernalia of death.
We don’t keep photos of their grieving loved ones, their now widowed spouses, their heartbroken parents and kids, because none of these images serve our real incessant need for fashionable soldiers on the dark side who do our emotional dirty work us, writing and singing about the horrific sadness, and battles with inner demons, and with themselves, and looking beautiful the whole time, as though you could walk through the ugliest parts of life without so much as getting your makeup smeared.
And we secretly love their little or blatant references about drugs because they say and do publicly what many of us do and hide privately. We’d like to do a bump on a plane on the way to work. Or to have a drink in the back seat of a limo, or the actually ingest drugs at a concert in front of thousands of people like we didn’t give a damn.
Tragic beautiful rock stars, are our nasty mental porn, and their all important image, is far more important to us than their music most of the time, because in terms of our idea of beauty, there hasn’t been an obese, bad-looking, unfashionable female pop star since Mama Cass, despite the fact that there have been some mind-blowing, incredible female musicians who were just that, and we don’t even know them or don’t give them a second glance as we shop for cd’s. The same applies for record companies.
If fact, anything unfashionable by hollywood model standards, which often include Gia Karangi (seen here in the famous photo shoot where they used makeup to cover her bleeding heroin track marks) levels of anorexia, drug addiction, and near-death bulimic weight problems, is simply not even looked at by us, or the industry, because it doesn’t fit the fantasy they want to sell, nor the one we want to buy and remember.
No, for us, the death, sexual beauty, torment, and ultimate finale act of our preferred idols who die early, must be tasteful, well-dressed in the latest fashions, smell good, feel good, and give us closure before we go on to spiritually feed, and act like social vampires with the next young beautiful idol that comes along, because our love of them, says something about us.
We are fakes. Most of us. We hide our real feeling about drugs, death, and sex, deep down, while shaking our heads at a “tragedy” that we had part in, though most people I know who adored Amy Winehouse, see themselves, as in no way connected to her death, though they hypocritically felt themselves connected to her life.
The truth is, we never knew these people. Not in then slightest.The vast majority of us never sent them letters asking them to quit drugs, or how we could help. We don’t send condolences to their parents, or loved ones.
Amy, Kurt, Jimi, Michael, Darby, Dee Dee……
I could go on forever, but they won’t. because they’re dead.
And they did it with our support, and on our dime, and for our sins.
Maybe one day we’ll actually appreciate the sunny, happy, lyrically upbeat music that so many non-edgy, balanced, family-type artists make.
Maybe we’ll see that we have been trained in sardonic negativity, and been trained by the music, film, and fashion industry to think that it is any more real than someone singing “I love you baby”
Maybe one day, we’ll stop providing fuel for these hurt, gifted artists to kill themselves with.
And maybe we’ll stop encouraging our kids to think that there is something fashionable about cracked-out, deathly, bulimic, tortured musicians, and stop presenting them as role models.
But that will require for us to admit what, and who a lot of us really are:
In the equation between our tortured rock stars and ourselves, we are really the ones who are dark, sad, morbid, with suicidal musings, and addicted.
We just need someone else to do it for us.
Godspeed, Amy.
You will be missed.



As ever, P.O your writing is insightful, thought provoking and lends a very human bent to a star-lit tragedy. It is easy for most consumers to mourn the dead rockstar; it is part of the fabric of loving them from afar, idolizing them, and the inherent morbid fascination with watching them fail and too often, die, while the music industry (read: execs) take full advantage of our fascination and allow — nay — implicitly condone the behaviors that feed the tabloids and more consumerism, recapitulating the vicious cycle. Keeping writing; I’m listening.
I like this, but I have a few problems with the general idea behind it. I don’t think that self-destruction is as necessary as being honest, and Amy Winehouse was as uncompromisingly honest as anyone who has ever been called “Pop.” She refused to compromise her music at all, and her sound reflected this. However, she changed her appearance on a few occasions because of criticism (watch “Fuck Me Pumps”, then “Rehab.” The weight change was from criticism of her body not being thin enough to remain competitive in her genre), and was no stranger to bouts of depression and drug use, even before the general attitude in the media was negative.
You can say what you will, and there are a few studies linking depression and creativity, but her personality was separate from the voice that we all fell for. It didn’t help that the world sat by watching her decline, but she had more money and support than some other addicts, and she still slowly destroyed herself.
Addiction is a disease. If there is something that proves it, it is the death of Amy Winehouse. Some people can struggle with addiction and come out on top. Other people can’t ever get their heads above the water. To say that the public killed these celebrities is ignorant. There are people who manage to overcome addiction from cardboard box homes with no family or friends, and there are people who can’t with all the help in the world.
Let’s not point fingers right now, because it does a disservice to the memory of a promising artist with a terrible affliction. Instead, let’s take a moment to think about the people who are trying to beat mental disorders and addiction, and ask how we can help. If her death inspires one person to reach out and help someone, I would say that she didn’t die in vain. Rest in peace Amy Winehouse, you’ve earned it.
This is what I am talking about. I think people insult her by making her into only a chanteuse here to entertain them regardless of the cost to her, or the disconnect with reality in the situation as it pertains to them. No one here needs a basic primer on addiction. Especially not anyone in the industry, Which I certainly hope you are not, given your less-than-precise observations.
You (the empirical “you” not “you” personally) think of her voice and personality as separate, as though you only see and hear what you want to. That is a very consumerist attitude. As a vocalist who toured and recorded for 35 years with bands, I can tell without reservation, that a person’s personality and their voice can never, ever, be separated. They are one and the same.
Obviously, most people don’t know anything about her “sound”. It wasn’t hers to begin with. it was the product of the Dap-Kings, and her producer Mark Ronson, together with her voice and lyrics. It was carefully planned, perfectly executed, and expertly mixed, and remixed. with a very particular strategy in mind.
The sound is more early girl band New York soul and hip hop, than it is “her own sound”, regardless of anyone’s fantasy take on the situation. This is all a matter of record for anyone who really wants to know about her music.
That said, Personality is precisely what made her great. Her vocals were ALL personality, her inflections, wit, flats and sharps, breathing, and just the way her body sounded, were 100% personality in spades.
People only seeing what they want, buying into a fabricated image and then claiming to speak on behalf of someone they know nothing about, while being in full scale denial about this business, and it’s pitfalls, is exactly what I am addressing. Thank you for so perfectly embodying my point.
Sorry. that last statement makes me sound like a jerk, Which I am not trying to be, however, I find the point of view of non-musicians to be incredibly uniform, to the point where it makes me feisty during a otherwise civil debate.
I hope I have not offended you with my fiery comment, however if your blog http: //whenimnotwritingmybook.blogspot.com/ is any indication, you are more than ready for a good-natured roustabout, and hopefully you will take my comments in the tone in which they were meant.
Way to swing the double edged sword on this one PO. And very well written, to say the least. You are saying for a lot of us what needs to be said. And that rocks with both hands headbanging
Something about this post really rubs me the wrong way. I’m sure some people liked her songs because they could vicariously live out self-destructive fantasies through them, but it’s ignorant to paint all of her fans with the same brush. For my part, I liked her songs (especially her lyrics) because they rang true, even if that truth was dysfunctional and scary. But you seem to be accusing everyone of getting off on it somehow, which is just bullshit, as much as it would be to say that about my appreciation of art that deals with war, rape, the Holocaust or any other grim subject.
I don’t see why appreciating the work of someone who’s got their own demons should be vilified. Nobody says, “Hemingway had a lot of problems and eventually killed himself, therefore if we enjoy his art we’re all guilty of endorsing those problems.” I personally would hate for someone to think of my own art that way, because that’s completely the opposite of my philosophy. I write songs to get my demons out, and I share them with people so if they can relate they might feel a little relief and compassion. I would hate if after I passed someone were to shame people for having enjoyed my work.
I respect your opinion, but I disagree. As with most literature, or blogs, this would fall under the “if the shoe fits, wear it” category. If it doesn’t fit you, I respect that.
I was not condemning, or vilifying anyone in for their love of her music, I was calling into question vicarious nature of Fandom, and also the fact that yes, the CD you bought, went up her nose or in her pipe, period, end of story. We have a part in the story, and we need to be honest with ourselves about it. We like this particular kind of mental porn. Just own it. it would be more honest for all of us.
if you cannot deal with the reality of consumer-end politics that is no one’s fault but your own, and if my post makes you uncomfortable, then perhaps you are not in touch with the realities of this industry. I am.
Perhaps 35 years touring on the road writing, and dealing with other musicians, press agents, record companies, talent bookers, mobsters, and drugs and such, as well as knowing a lot of famous rock star types, has given me a particular angle on the thing. Also I have lost several good friends to drugs, anorexia, and a host of ailments particular to this industry.
So here, no one gets a pass. not even the consumer or “fan”, because fans can kill you dead. Hopefully you won’t find this out in the first person.
P.S. I listened to your music, and found it forward moving, upbeat, and hardly the kind of music that anyone would regret having listened to, that is, unless you wound up using the money from the CD of yours I am about to buy off of bandcamp, and bought some coke or smack and OD’d with it, and then died. Or maybe lived a tormented few years first.
IN that case, yes. I would be sad about it.
So don’t OD or die on me please with the money you get from me buying your CD, because then I will write another blog with you as the tragic musical character, and that would really piss you off, because you wouldn’t even be in a position to comment on it then. Imagine that!
Peace.
I believe as much as anyone else that individuals have power that, while small in and of itself, manifests in larger patterns for which we bear some responsibility. This is why I eat vegetarian, vote, ride my bike to work, etc. Still, I don’t think such a simple cause-effect culpability can be drawn for Amy’s plight. For my own part, my partner bought her album and I started listening to it, and this was before she had such a reputation for self-destructive behavior. Even if this were to be someone whom I had a much greater influence on–for instance, a friend with a drinking problem whom I lent money, not specifically to buy booze, but cash in hand nonetheless–and something awful happened to them, I would not say that I was responsible for their fate. I might feel guilt, but objectively I don’t think that simply having engaged with them by giving them attention and financial means makes me complicit in their demise.
Anyway, I responded on Twitter, but I wanted to make sure you saw it: my “Team make-the-world-a-shittier-place” barb was not aimed at you, but at people who were berating Amy’s fans for not being sufficiently upset about Norway. You seem like a thoughtful dude, I’d like to keep our dialogue in this forum where we can express ourselves at length and make ourselves understood. I think it serves both of us better. And thank you for your kind words about the music.
Perhaps you just feel it a little more and feel more responsible than your ordinary consumer, which would be something we have in common.
And that is my whole point. I think that you bear no guilt whatsoever. However we all bear some social responsibility for being parts of an organism that functions the way it does.
At what point do we call the machine on it’s function and ideologically stand up to it? Or do we simply watch as some of the best and brightest, (an example is what some people both morbidly, and lovingly referred to as the “27 club”) are continually eaten and destroyed by it?
The “fame machine’s” relationship to actual music has little to do with the music, nothing to do with the individual, and is all about corporate profit, and corporate greed. And they use our unknowing, and adoring attention of the musicians we come to love, against them, and against us ourselves.
I appreciate your being open minded enough to deconstruct our initial exchange, to consider what I was saying, as i did with you and what you were saying.
yeah, and those people who want you, or anyone for that matter to feel bad for mourning what you mourn and not mourning what they mourn?
They are merely the fundamentalist Christians of thought: One way only: Their way or no way, And to hell with them.
I think that guilt, is the most unrevolutionary emotion on earth
Here;s to freedom.
Peace
P
“… coolest guy you’ll ever meet?” haha i dont know about that my man but i do know you need to keep writing — excellent article my friend.
There is something in our humanity that drives us (them) to live vicariously. This ‘something’ is a balance we depend on, a duality upon which our freewill hinges: certainty and uncertainty. Obviously, we could not survive as a species if we tilted to far to the uncertain: the wreckless lifestyles we immortalize in the Winehouse’s and Morrison’s. But as well, we could not survive if we tilted as far to the certain: living the perfect quaint existences we dream of, with pretty wives and well behaved children in our quaint cozy homes. And so we find a balance, always striving for the quaint while keeping wreckless shadows.
This is how, my friend, we keep civilization free.
Obviously, you haven’t met me yet.
Thank you for the compliment, and for checking out my blog.
I’m gonna keep reading. and i suggest if you live around philly we go grab a few beers.
I don’t live around Philly, but I was considering getting a REAL cheeseteak soon,, since the ones I am told are Fugazi here, (SF Oakland area of northern California) are pretty good., and I figure the real things must be off the charts. I’ll stay in touch. thanks!
Beautifully and compassionately stated.
Great article